Farm
to Table Experiential Learning
Carlos
Guerrero, M. Rose Hobby, Kimberly Neal, and Katie Ross
Ball
State University
Name
|
Commented On:
|
Carlos
Guerrero
|
Group 3 & Group 4
|
M.
Rose Hobby
|
Group 2
|
Kimberly
Neal
|
Group 4, Group 5
|
Katie
Ross
|
Group 4
|
The farm to table movement began during the 1960s in
California and Washington; however, it has spread rapidly in the last decade
due to the growing number of adults who desire a healthy and economical
alternative to processed foods. It emphasizes organic farming methods,
quality products, nutrition, and taste over speed and convenience.
Learning to grow food and raise animals, discovering where to find fresh
locally sourced fruits, vegetables, and meats, seasonal menu planning, proper
preparation, and simple cooking methods are all important skills associated
with a farm to table program. The purpose of this three-day seminar is to
provide participants with a brief, but concise introduction to the primary
components of the farm to table process and an exploration of the main concepts
through a series of experiential learning opportunities in which reflective
practice combined with situated cognition will be utilized. Adults of all
ages can participate, and at the conclusion of the program students will gain a
better understanding of sustainable agriculture practices, the benefits of
eating locally grown food, how to plan in-season meals, and fresh food
preparation.
Rationale
The following content describes information from
literature and current businesses and programs utilized to inspire our approach
of an experiential farm to table program.
Ideas
from Literature
The structure of the three-day
seminar allows enough time to expose participants to essential themes of the
farm to table concept, participate in hands-on activities, listen to and speak
with personnel working in various aspects of the process, gain some practical
knowledge and basic skills, and reflect on the activities and new information
at various moments throughout the program.
The most common approach to experiential learning is from a
constructivist perspective, which focuses on critical reflection of a concrete
experience (Merriam, Caffarella, & Baumgartner, 2007) . Participants in this program are provided
with questions prior to the specific experience, for example the tour of a farm
that utilizes sustainable agriculture practices, and then asked to reflect on
those questions afterwards. At the
beginning of the next day, students are encouraged to share their thoughts and
adequate time is allotted for group discussions. This collaborative reflection method allows
for participants to process their experiences and transform experience into
learning (Mann, 2011).
Another important aspect of experiential
learning, situated cognition, occurs when students immerse themselves in a
social or physical environment that enhances their mental abilities (Merriam, et al., 2007). The farm to table program design places
participants in “real-life” situations, such as: helping on the farm with
gardening or caring for the animals, planning a menu and purchasing the
necessary items at a farmer’s market, and preparing a meal. The program also
introduces learners to the challenges facing farmers, restaurant owners, and
other personnel working in the field.
This situational perspective connects adults to the community of
practice associated with farm to table, and creates learning opportunities for
everyday living.
Reflection-in-action is a method
used in experiential learning that emphasizes immediate feedback from an
instructor to the student so that they can adjust learning in “real time” (Merriam, et al., 2007). There are several opportunities for
participants to engage in this type of learning during the hands-on activities
on the farm and in the kitchen. The
three-day seminar is meant to be an introduction to the subject of
farm-to-table and the target audience is adults with little or no knowledge of
the topic. Reflection-in-action is often
triggered by surprise (Merriam, et al., 2007).
Considering most participants in this program starting at ground zero, this
method is very appropriate due to the likelihood most of the information and
experiences presented will be something new.
Experiential programs should allow
students to be more self-directed in relation to learning, and provide
opportunities for freedom and flexibility built into the program design. Participants are provided several occasions
to choose what activities they wish to engage in on the farm experience. During the seasonal menu planning session,
the program offers suggested dishes, or the option for adults to design their
own. At the beginning of each day the
purpose of the experience planned is clearly stated and discussed, reflection
topics are distributed, and the students are given the schedule of
activities. In this manner, the
instructor establishes expectations about the role the participants will take,
and gives learners the power to take charge of their learning.
Ideas from Practical
Programs
The nature of the seminar format is to act
as an introduction to the farm to table concept, and be a catalyst to action on
the part of the participants. Because of
this, ideas for the program came from several existing programs that
incorporated one or two “pieces” of the farm to table process that ultimately
combined into the final design. The
first component was an established farm to table restaurant in Lodi, New York
called Suzanne Fine Regional Cuisine, owned and operated by Bob and Suzanne
Stack (“Our Finger Lakes Journey”, 2016).
The restaurant serves seasonal five-course dinners, caters weddings and
other special events, and expanded into culinary demonstrations and
classes. The cooking class size is
purposely very small, with a limit of 8 participants, and the demonstrations are
limited to 25 participants. The Stacks
are very adamant about remaining an authentic farm to table establishment with
regional food sources and top notch quality cuisine. Helping students gain an understanding of the
challenges faced by restaurant owners in this business and the farmers who
supply them is one of the primary outcomes of this program design.
The Auguste Escoffier School of
Culinary Arts in Boulder, Colorado has incorporated a six-week farm to table
experiential program into the curriculum.
Culinary students step out of the kitchen and on to farms and
ranches. This provides precious insight
into how local products are utilized in restaurant kitchens and the hard work
required to accomplish this task. Students
study sustainable agricultural processes and gain a better understanding of how
to make intelligent ingredient choices for menu planning. Participants also work
alongside farmers, ranchers, artisans, vintners, and others in the regional
area (Auguste Escoffier School of Culinary Arts, 2017). A fundamental understanding of food
production, harvesting, and transportation are all important aspects of the
farm to table process. Participants in the seminar will gain a better understanding
of these topics so they can transform this foundational information to learning
skills, such as seasonal menu planning, planting a garden, or even raising
livestock.
Finally, the city of Lowell,
Massachusetts has created an organization called Mill City Grows that focuses
on innovative approaches to food production and distribution. Additionally, the
organization provides education to the community in regards to utilizing land
and other local resources to the best of their ability. Mill City Grows created a Build-A-Garden
program that encompasses five community gardens and eleven school gardens in
the community. The organization manages
two urban farms including a 3.5-acre location that produces thousands of pounds
of healthy food for the surrounding neighborhoods. Educational programs include the Garden
Coordinator Institute, Gardener Training Program, and farm to table cooking
classes. In addition, the organization
promotes the local farmer’s markets and hosts special events throughout the
year such as the annual Seed Swap and a Farm to Cocktail Party (Mill City
Grows, n.d.). Not only did this program
provide several ideas for hands-on activities to incorporate into the seminar,
it also emphasized how this type of experiential learning fosters community
engagement, leadership, and empowers residents to improve the physical spaces
in their neighborhoods. This is a great
example of experiential learning translating to transformational learning.
Program: Farm to Table Seminar
In a three-day seminar, participants will explore the
farm to table concept. The course is open to adults ages 18 and over; no
experience is necessary. It will be offered four times throughout the
year so participants can experience the different seasons, if desired.
Tuition covers all tours and use of the available resources in the
kitchen/classroom. Additional expenses for participants include:
transportation to experiential sites, lunch at farm to table restaurant, and
purchases at the farmer’s market.
Learning
objectives
By the end of the seminar, students will be able to:
1. Understand
the benefits of eating locally grown food.
a.
Food is fresher, making it more flavorful
and nutritious.
b.
Supports the local economy.
- Learn to create balanced, in season
meals.
- Understand sustainable agriculture
practices.
- Explain challenges faced by farmers,
such as:
a.
Financial sustainability
b.
Food safety
Program
Events
Learning experiences will be presented in the following
manner to effectively achieve the learning objectives.
Day 1.
|
|
8:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will meet in the kitchen/classroom.
|
Introductions
·
Instructor introduces self and
his/her experience with the farm to table concept
·
Students introduce themselves and
share goals and reasons for taking the seminar
Instructor
introduces the purpose and schedule for the class
Students
receive discussion topics to reflect on during the day
·
Reflection topics:
1) How
do the utilized farming practices conserve resources such as soil and water?
2) How
does the farm protect biodiversity and maintain the ecosystem?
3) What
practices does the farm use to protect the wellbeing of the animals?
4) How
does the farm ensure food safety?
5) What
financial challenges do sustainable farmers face?
6) What
surprised you about this experience?
7) What
did you find to be the most beneficial activity of the day?
|
|
9:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will carpool to a local farm (distance – 30 miles).
|
10:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will meet at the farm.
|
Participants
will be guided through a general tour of the farm to include:
·
Barns
·
Fields, gardens, greenhouses
·
Food processing areas
|
|
12:00
p.m.
|
Lunch
|
1:00
p.m.
|
Students
will participate in farm activities.
|
Students
will select from the following options:
·
Assist with vegetable garden/greenhouse to learn sustainable
and organic farming practices
·
Follow dairy processing procedure
to understand food safety
·
Assist with animal care to learn
about animal welfare
|
|
3:00
p.m.
|
Participants
leave the farm.
|
3:30
p.m.
|
Students
meet in the kitchen/classroom.
|
Students
are split into groups for meal planning
·
Facilitator leads a group
discussion of seasonal foods
·
Each group creates a meal plan for
cooking the next day by producing an original menu or choosing from suggested
dishes
·
Groups list items needed from the
farmer’s market
|
|
5:00
p.m.
|
Class
adjourned.
|
Day 2.
|
|
8:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will meet in the kitchen/classroom.
|
Reflection
·
Facilitator and participants will
discuss the experiences and reflection topics from the previous day
Instructor
introduces purpose and schedule for day 2
Participants
receive discussion topics to reflect on during the day:
·
Reflection topics:
1) What
types of products are offered for sale at a farmer’s market?
2) How
far do most vendors travel with their products?
3) Why
do local farmers choose to sell their products this way?
4) How
do you think having the farmer’s market impacts the community?
5) What
are the benefits of eating in season foods?
6) What
observations did you make about cooking with local ingredients?
|
|
9:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will carpool to the farmer’s market (Distance – 10 miles).
|
9:15
a.m.
|
Participants
will gather at the farmer’s market.
|
A
tour of the farmer’s market will be led by a local participant
|
|
10:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will explore the market.
|
While
exploring the market, students should:
·
Make purchases to create a meal based on the plan
from day 1
·
Talk with vendors about their experience with
farmer’s markets
|
|
12:00
p.m.
|
Lunch
at the Farmer’s Market
|
1:00
p.m.
|
Participants
will meet at the kitchen/classroom.
|
Upon
return, students will:
|
|
4:00
p.m.
|
Participants
will hold a class potluck.
|
Groups
share prepared dishes
Each
group delivers short presentations
|
|
5:00
p.m.
|
Class
adjourned.
|
Day 3
|
|
8:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will meet in the kitchen/classroom.
|
Reflection
Facilitator introduces
purpose and schedule for day 3
Participants receive discussion
topics to reflect on during the day:
• Reflection
topics:
1) Why
do staff members choose to work at a farm to table restaurant?
2) Where
does the restaurant purchase ingredients from? How much comes from local sources?
3) Does
the menu change based on available ingredients? How?
4) What
connections can you see between the farm, the market, and restaurant?
5) What
are your observations about the experience?
|
|
9:00
a.m.
|
Participants
will carpool to local farm to table restaurant (Distance – 10 miles).
|
9:20
a.m.
|
Participants
will meet staff and chefs at the restaurant.
|
·
Participants will interview chefs,
managers, and staff
|
|
10:30
a.m.
|
Participants
will be provided a tour of the restaurant.
|
12:00
p.m.
|
Lunch
at the restaurant
|
1:00
p.m.
|
Participants
will return to the kitchen/classroom.
|
1:15
p.m.
|
Students
will meet and reflect.
|
Facilitator
will ask learners to discuss:
·
Restaurant experience
·
Reflection topics
Participants
will be asked to complete an evaluation
·
Evaluation prompts:
1) What
was your favorite part of the class?
2) What
was your least favorite part? How
could it be improved?
3) Do
you feel the learning objectives were met?
4) If
not, which objectives were lacking?
5) How
has your view of the farm to table concept changed?
6) Are
there any topics or activities you would like to see offered in the future?
|
|
2:15
p.m.
|
Seminar
adjourned.
|
Reflection
Highlights
The farm to table
seminar program design incorporates four major concepts into the program
curriculum: experiential learning, self-directed learning, situated cognition,
and constructivism. Participants have the opportunity to become involved with
several activities to bring the farm to table experience to life. Experiential
opportunities are integrated throughout the entirety of the seminar as the
primary educational process. The program incorporates the constructivist
approach in that participants are exposed to experiences firsthand and encouraged
to reflect upon them so they can create their own understanding. Reflection is
an integral component of the seminar as reflection must occur to process
learning experiences in order to gain knowledge. Reflection is encouraged
through guided reflection topics and discussion.
Self-directed
learning is incorporated into the program design by allowing the participant to
make choices in their educational experience. For example, learners choose
activities at the farm, shop and explore at the farmer’s market in groups, and
create food of their own choosing. Situated cognition immerses the learner in
the field environment, including social and cultural interactions. Participants
are physically present at the farm, farmer’s market, and restaurant where they
can observe, interact with, and gain insight from those who work in these
environments daily.
Process
First, the group discussed the assignment using Zoom,
text messaging, and email. Roles were assigned as described in the group plan. Group
members emailed ideas and information for various programs. We decided a
farm-to-table program would be an excellent experiential learning opportunity.
Once the topic was collaboratively approved, we decided upon details of
program, such as the length and activities to include. Each member completed
assigned tasks and requested feedback.
Tips that are a consensus of the group are to plan and
communicate often. The program design portion went smoothly and the leader,
Katie, did a great job leading this assignment. Our initial communication using
Zoom was easy to use. Users can even project computer screens into the
conversation so participants can visualize specific information to further
clarify points while discussing them simultaneously. An ongoing group text
allows for easy communication and quick responses. Emails are better for bulky
information. It is vital group members check their email often for optimal
communication.
Table 2. Summary of the Literature Review
Main Ideas in the
Literature
|
Application of Main
Ideas in Practice
|
Constructivist
perspective allows learners to construct knowledge from their concrete
experiences.
|
Educators
can instigate learning by providing an experience that invokes an emotional
or physical response, and problem-based curriculum such as “adventure”
activities, role-playing, or case studies. The practitioner can educate the
benefits of eating organic farming to invoke a response for the student to
eat healthier. In addition, the practitioner can set up the learning
environment where he or she uses effective directed questions to ensure the
students understood the farm to table experience, and allot time for
collaborative discussions.
|
Situational
Perspective—emphasizes connection between learner and their community of
practice.
|
The practitioner can
create a curriculum that is comprised of authentic
“real life” problem-based activities. The educator will have to be creative
and use everyday tools or props that are available to the learner’s
environment. In our program design, the instructor uses kitchen equipment and
natural ingredients.
|
Reflection-in-action
can be used as a tool for experiential learning.
|
The practitioner can
create a learning environment where students can receive immediate feedback
by the instructor and quickly analyze their steps during a task or group
assignment. In our farm to table program,
the instructor is introducing a healthy alternative to processed foods that
may be contemporary for some learners. It is expected that learners will make
mistakes or will need reinforcement during the hands on farm activity or meal
planning. In those instances, the facilitator will adjust the learning in
“real time”.
|
Experiential
programs should allow students to be self-directed and learn from the natural
consequences of the activity.
|
The
facilitator outlines the participants’ goals and reasons for joining the
seminar. The students are introduced to organic farming and are provided with
options of how they want to learn. Students take charge of their learning by
selecting a prepared meal plan or design one of their own.
|
Table 3. Summary of the Program Design
Purposes
|
Our 3-day seminar is
designed to teach participants the basic components of organic farming and
meal preparation from local meats, produce, and vegetables.
|
Objectives
|
At the end of the 3 day seminar, the
participants will:
|
Rationales - Ideas
from the Literature
|
|
Rationales - Features
from Practical Cases
|
|
Highlights and Major
Components of the Program You Designed
|
We have four learning components in our
program design: constructivism, situated cognition, self-direction, &
incorporation of experiential learning into a curriculum.
|
References
Auguste Escoffier School
of Culinary Arts. (2017). Farm to table
experience. Retrieved from:
http://www.escoffier.edu/programs/culinary-arts/farm-to-table-experience/
Mann, K. V. (2011). Theoretical
perspectives in medical education: Past experience and future
possibilities. Medical Education, 45, 60-68. doi:
10.1111/j.l365-2923.2010.03757.x
Merriam, S.B.,
Caffarella, R.S., & Baumgarter, L. M. (2007). Learning in adulthood: A
comprehensive text (3rd
ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Mill City Grows. (n.d.).
Retrieved from: http://www.millcitygrows.org/
Our Finger Lakes journey.
(2016). Retrieved from: http://www.suzannefrc.com/
Group Member Roles
Name
|
Role
|
Carlos Guerrero
|
·
Fill out table 3 (Summary of Program Design)
and add table 2 from the literature reviews
|
M. Rose Hobby
|
·
Write up step 5 (Reflection)
·
Edit final program design
·
Post final design to blog
|
Kimberly Neal
|
·
Write up steps 2 & 3 (Intro &
Rationale)
|
Katie Ross (Group Leader)
|
·
Write up step 4 (Program)
|
All
|
·
Contribute ideas for the program topic
·
Post literature review to the blog
|
I really liked your daily schedule, it was very helpful in getting an idea of how all of the elements will come together. I think a lot of people are interested in your concept. I know I'm very interested in the "farm to table" movement, but as a city kid, I've never had the confidence to learn more about it. I wouldn't even know where to start! This seminar sounds like an immersive, interesting, non-threatening way for people of all kinds of experience levels with farming and cooking to dive in to farm to table practices.
ReplyDeleteGreat job, Group 1! Really interesting topic. This is a really well thought out program and it is a great example of an experiential learning experience. I appreciated the structure of the program - it seems to have a good balance of hands on learning and time for reflection. I'm wondering how you came up with the idea. Did someone have this type of experience before? Do you personally know professionals in this field for the evaluation part of the process? Again...really interesting work. I look forward to reading more!
ReplyDeleteWhat a wonderful program and idea! I think you selected a very thoughtful topic and executed it in a very creative way. I think the program does a very sound job of introducing experiences in useful and well-situated contexts. The program would really help immerse a person in the topic of farm-to-table restaurants by exploring issues and also visiting and meeting with people who do relevant work in the field.
ReplyDeleteI wonder about the audience and what social context the class would be taught in or could possibly be taught in? Would the makeup or aims or tone of the class be different if you were teaching retirees vs. college-aged students. If you were teaching a suburban or an urban population? Or would it not matter? I think it's great how versatile the class could be with regard to these issues.
Good questions!
DeleteBo
Thanks Michael! In my opinion, I don't think the tone or aim of the class would be different in regards to the age group or social context in which the class takes place. It is an introduction to the process, and the goals of farm-to-table stay the same for young or old, suburban or urban - better tasting food, better nutrition, etc. However, the program could be designed with a certain angle to appeal to a particular audience - for example where to find farmer's markets in urban areas or gardening techniques for small spaces. Thanks for the input!
DeleteI absolutely love this idea!! What a practical program. I also appreciate your thorough table. I also think that the evaluation at the end of the program is a great addition and so necessary. You've done a great job. I would love to be in this program myself!
ReplyDeleteThis sounds like a great program and one I would gladly sign up to do with my daughter (she's been my sous chef since she was three). I wonder if it might be more effective to switch days two and three around so that they go to the restaurant before they make their own meals. I think it would be helpful to see what a FtT restaurant is like before having to come up with one's own menu.
ReplyDeleteWe actually did consider that, Terry. It definitely made sense to go to the restaurant before making the meal. There are 2 reasons it ended up this way. The restaurant experience is suppose to be a culmination of the entire program. The students follow the process on their own first, going to the farm and then preparing a meal. And then visit the restaurant to see how someone has successfully created a business around this concept.
DeleteAlso, it came down to timing. The last day is shorter than the other two and it didn't work very well to switch activities to different days without having the second day be the shorter one. This seemed to flow the best.
Thanks for the suggestion though!
I cannot begin to tell you how cool this program sounds. I would participate in this! I especially appreciated that you laid out some learning objectives. I think it's easy to say that something that is hands-on is experiential but your group really captured the importance of laying some ground work with discussion and posing questions followed by experiential activities. I liked that you have participants talking with people who are involved in the whole farm to table process. It's clear that many perspectives are included so that while participants are experiencing the process first-hand, they are also talking with others who have experience to learn from them. I know this wasn't necessarily part of the assignment, but I'm wondering how you would recruit for this program and how it would possibly be funded. It sounds like something the Farm Bureau could sponsor. ;)
ReplyDeletebut I'm wondering how you would recruit for this program and how it would possibly be funded. It sounds like something the Farm Bureau could sponsor. ;)
Delete--- I was thinking about the same question when I read this paper. I was thinking whether or not we should change the final assignment to the dissemination of the program students designed. :)
Bo
Great questions, Alyssa! I hadn't thought very much about the context of the class, but imagined it as part of a larger program. Either through community ed, a culinary program, or maybe sponsored by a farm to table restaurant. The Farm Bureau is a good idea too!
DeleteI envisioned this program as something that would be funded and promoted through partnerships within the farm-to-table process, and organized/spearheaded by a community organization. For example, involving a culinary department in the cooking aspect (then use the university kitchens and outreach for promotion), the farmer's market vendor's (have flyers or other promotional item for distribution), the farm-to-table restaurant could help promote the event - with participants receiving a coupon for the restaurant after completing the seminar, and yes I love the Farm Bureau idea, the local 4-H group, Agribusiness programs, etc. Everyone in the process stands to benefit with more participation from the community. Thanks for the comments - I really enjoyed working on this project. My group members are great and Katie did a great job leading this project.
DeleteCarlos, Rose, Kimberly, and Katie,
ReplyDeleteThis is an excellent program design paper! I really like the idea of Farm to Table! You blended the theoretical ideas into your design quite well! The summary tables are very thorough and concrete!
Suggestions:
1. You described the main features of the practical programs. Tell us how you plan to integrate the features from these practical cases into the program you designed.
2. The program incorporates the constructivist approach in that participants are exposed to experiences firsthand and encouraged to reflect upon them so they can create their own understanding.
Self-directed learning is incorporated into the program design by allowing the participant to make choices in their educational experience.
--- Since your topic is about experiential learning, focus on experiential learning.
3. Check your APA format. For example:
Mill City Grows. (n.d.). Retrieved from: http://www.millcitygrows.org/
Our Finger Lakes journey. (2016). Retrieved from: http://www.suzannefrc.com/
--- Check APA about online materials. You need to italicize the title.
Bo
Great job! I would definitely be interested in a program like this. I think self-directed learning is great for this concept so that participants can make the things they learn applicable to the lifestyles. This program design is very organized and easy to read. Awesome job!
ReplyDeleteI love your program Group 1! Your program design is great! I like how you laid out your three day seminar and how you gave examples of comparable programs. I also liked your summary table of your program design. Well done!
ReplyDelete